The Origin of AIDS and HIV May Not Be What
You Have Learned
Most people believe that the origin of HIV, the AIDS virus, derives
from some natural evolutionary event. Key among these HIV origin
theories is the so called "cut hunter theory" in which a human,
allegedly African native, received a bloody wound or infected splash
while preparing a chimpanzee carrying a similar virus (i.e., SIVcpz).
Most recent research, along with the scientific consensus, holds
that the origin of HIV and AIDS could never have happened this way.
In 2001, The Royal Society of London's conference proceedings, which
sought to determine the initial cause of AIDS and the origin of
HIV, were published for the world to behold. The most highly respected
scientists and academicians debated the possibility that HIV-1,
the most widespread and deadly human AIDS virus, evolved from accidental
vaccine contaminations and subsequent transmissions to mostly African villagers. The oral polio vaccine (OPV) received the focus
of interest here since that vaccine was partially derived from growing
live polio viruses in monkey kidney cells that have historically
proven to be contaminated with cancer viruses such as SV40 -- the 40th
monkey virus ever discovered. This virus, like HIV-1, is currently linked by medical scientists
to widespread human cancers. By the end of the symposium, the esteemed
delegates concluded HIV's origin, and AIDS, was not likely to have
come from polio vaccine transmissions as chimpanzees were not proven
to have been used during the manufacture of this vaccine
The hepatitis B vaccine was not considered by this esteemed gathering. Suspiciously neglected, this vaccine was produced in chimpanzees during pilot testing conducted in New York City, among gay men, and Central African villagers between 1972 and 1974. This was precisely timed for the emergence of AIDS in these exact, demographically distinct, communities by the late 1970s. The fact that this fact was neglected proves shoddy science or gross negligence at best.
Importantly, among the most respected of all HIV/AIDS origin
theorists, the U.S. Government's chief DNA sequence analyst at the
Los Alamos Laboratory in
New Mexico
, Dr. Gerald Myers, reported
with his colleagues that the origin of HIV could not have begun
with "cut hunters" or other single isolated cross species transmissions
(called "zoonosis"). He reported that genetic sequencing studies prove
some "punctuated origin of AIDS event" took place during the mid-1970s
giving rise, virtually simultaneously, to at least ten different
HIV "clades" (or genetic subtypes) associated with ten different
distinguishable AIDS epidemics in Africa alone. The most likely
cause of this widespread bizarre zoonosis
was some man-made (i.e., iatrogenic) event involving chimpanzees.
Myers and his colleagues offered the following best explanation for
the origin of HIV: "It is
not far-fetched," they wrote, "to imagine the ten
or so clades deriving from a single animal (perhaps immunosuppressed and possessing a swarm of variants) [as might
have been the case with chimpanzees used in the process of hepatitis B vaccine
manufacture] or from a few animals that might have belonged to a
single troop or might have been gang-caged together. The number
of animals required is secondary to the extent of variation in the
source at the time of the zoonotic or iatrogenic event. The [vaccine] hypothesis makes
a case for such a punctuated origin
. . ." (See: Burr T, Hyman JM and Myers G. The origin of
acquired immune deficiency syndrome: Darwinian or Lamarchkian?
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.
B (2001) 356:877-887.)
So if chimpanzees were not used to make the polio vaccine, and therefore
the origin of HIV and AIDS did not come from this vaccine nor time
period (1950s-early 1960s), then what other vaccine, given during
the early to mid 1970s, might have used one or more SIVcpz-infected
chimpanzees in the manufacturing process?
The answer to this question was singularly advanced by a Harvard-degreed
independent investigator, Dr. Leonard Horowitz in the award winning
book Emerging
Viruses: AIDS & Ebola -- Nature, Accident or Intentional?
(Tetrahedron Press, 1998; 1-888-508-4787; http:www.tetrahedron.org)
Dr. Horowitz unearthed and reprinted stunning scientific documents
and National Institutes of Health contracts proving that chimpanzees,
contaminated with numerous viruses, were used to produce hundreds
of hepatitis B vaccine doses administered to central African Blacks
along with homosexual men in New York City at precisely the time
Dr. Myers and colleagues claim the origin of HIV "punctuated event"
occurred.
Unfortunately, as another Royal Society conference presenter, Dr.
Julian Cribb, protested, too little attention
is given by drug-industry-influenced medical journals, and the mainstream
media, to controversial truths in science regarding the origin of
HIV and AIDS. (See: Cribb J. The origin of acquired immune deficiency syndrome:
can science afford to ignore it? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B (2001) 356:935-938.)
As a result, documents such as those published by Dr. Horowitz,
and others, showing AIDS apparently derives from contaminated hepatitis
B vaccines, have never received adequate attention.
For
a FEATURE ARTICLE on this topic by Dr. Leonard Horowitz click
here.
To sign up for Dr. Horowitz's free newsletter, sponsored by Healthy World Distributing, LLC, click here to register your e-mail address.
|
